Spencer- I thought that your paper has a really interesting
and controversial topic and the paper itself has very voice. This is a topic
that is always being debated and gets more and more controversial as the debate
goes on. I thought all aspects of the paper were very well written. I do think
that paper is missing research that will help your credibility and help the
reader understand the question.
Marlon- This is a really interesting question to be asking.
I really liked the introduction that you had. It caught my attention and got me
very interested in the paper. I think the body of the paper itself could
include a lot more analysis of these curse words like why is it that people use
them and what they literally mean vs. what we use them as.
Sapna- I think you have a really interesting topic to
discuss. The introduction does a very good job of clearly stating the question
of the inquiry to the reader however, I think that it could be improved by
adding some personal anecdotes or stories from other people about burritos to
give a good hook to the reader. You seem to have done a lot of research into
the history of burritos. This is good and it helps the reader get a good
understanding of burritos. I do think that there may be a little bit too much
of this however. Since the question of the paper is to find the perfect
burrito, I think there needs to be more personal fieldwork (description of
eating burritos). I noticed that in your conclusion, you didn’t clearly mention
whether or not you found the answer to your question. Being an inquiry paper, I
think your conclusion should include this. Overall this is a very good rough
draft and there is a lot of good information to work with and mold.
No comments:
Post a Comment