Friday, November 14, 2014

Peer Review science feature

Brendan’s paper:
               -I thought the lead was really good. It was very interesting and brought me into the paper very well.
               -Could have developed the intro lead a little bit more to make it a more effective hook.
               -I found all of the examples that you found very interesting. Especially the large part about the 3D printing.
               -I think you could add a bit more of a comprehensive conclusion to wrap up the paper and your thoughts on 3D printing.
               -Transitions are good
Kelly’s paper:
               -I think you had a great first sentence that sparked a ton of interest to keep reading but after the first sentence you went right into the heart of the paper. I think you could do a little more with the lead.
               -I think the first paragraph can be broken up to be smaller paragraphs that are more specific to one sub-topic,
               -You did a good job of simply explaining the cost benefits of making and selling meth.
Spencer’s paper:
               -Good lead
               -good data to support points

               -Needs a better conclusion to either wrap up the paper or expand on the future

No comments:

Post a Comment